

Gato visibly pauses and his brain breaks for a few seconds from the the sheer illogic of how the situation derailed, before he just loses his cool and shouts to Kou that he's "the enemy, idiot!" The look on his face when it happens makes it that much funnier. Kou is so nervous during their first battle that when Gato berates him on the battlefield about not acting like a grunt and seeing the big picture (meant as an insult), Kou actually takes the comment as sincere advice from a mentor and abashedly tells Gato "Y-yes sir.". Meanwhile, his deuteragonist and rival, Kou Uraki, is a straight-laced and earnest Ensign Newbie who finds himself in the seat of a prototype Gundam when he sees Gato stealing another prototype.

Anavel Gato, the Zeon " Nightmare of Solomon", is a Principles Zealot who lectures his "corrupt" Earth Federation enemies, while being a Big Brother Mentor to the men still remaining on his side. Done hilariously in Mobile Suit Gundam 0083: Stardust Memory.Tachikoma: AIs that can't handle a simple self-reference paradox are real suckers. See also Readings Blew Up the Scale and Explosive Instrumentation. For a similar mutually negating pair of principles, see Catch-22 Dilemma. Not to be confused with Logical Fallacies (though some Logic Bombs use the fallacies listed in that page). Koans can be seen as a less harmful form, used for religious or mystical purposes. Breaker.įor the human equivalent, see some of the entries under Brown Note and You Cannot Grasp the True Form. A Temporal Paradox might be the cause.įor when the player does this to a Video Game A.I., see A.I. A Logic Bomb that undoes reality itself is a Reality-Breaking Paradox. When a logical error outright retcons someone or something out of existence, that's Puff of Logic. If you want to do this to a well-organized group of people, use an Apple of Discord instead. Invoking logical paradoxes is also sometimes used in stories (and has been, since well before computers were invented) to defeat curses, laws, and other rules-based systems.

Overload attacks are probably always going to be realistic, though. However, things like buffer or stack overflows are artifacts of our current underlying computer hardware architectures and it's quite plausible that such things won't exist in future computer systems. They can also be bogged down or BSoD'd with programs such as fork bombs (each instance of the program opens two more). Of course these don't cause the machine to explode, but instead places the computing device entirely under your control.
MELTDOWN COMICS TWITCH SOFTWARE
When fed a paradoxical statement, a sufficiently well-programmed system would just notice the Logic Bomb has taken up too many resources and kill its thread, such as when Windows flags an application as "Not Responding" and prompts you to close it.Ĭomputer software is often vulnerable to being fed inputs that cause buffer overflows or inject commands. While this might have worked before the mid-1990s, computer systems designed since then are capable of creating discrete "threads" to handle problems, which run in their own space while the critical parts of the system continue uninterrupted. The end result is still a super computer muttering an error several times before exploding.
MELTDOWN COMICS TWITCH FREE
Occasionally the way to shut down such a computer is less like a few odd statements, and more like an advanced philosophical debate on the nature of truth, free will and purpose. Some ridiculously dumb AIs are also immune to logic bombs by virtue of not understanding the concept of paradox - a sort of inverted case of Achievements in Ignorance. Be warned if the Logic Bomb fails to destroy the system outright (and in some cases, even when it does), the system's surviving remnants may go insane and attempt to kill you just the same.Īlso note that Ridiculously Human Robots (and some very advanced AIs) are generally able to recognize and defuse logic bombs on sight, long before they go off (and may view this as a particularly irritating kind of Fantastic Racism). Paradoxes and contradictory statements (especially contradictory orders) have become the primary material used to build the Logic Bomb and thus the standard way to defeat any sophisticated, computerized system or AI. If the computer is a robot, this will probably result in Your Head A-Splode. A fictional computer will attempt to debate and solve the paradox until it melts down. The easiest way to confuse it is with the Liar's Paradox, i.e. In fiction-land, however, it will explode. If you give a computer nonsensical orders in the real world it will, generally, do nothing (or possibly appear to freeze as it loops eternally trying to find a solution to the unsolvable problem presented to it). Is your sentient supercomputer acting up? Good news.
